Facial Plastic Surgery in Ontario

Most reviewers experience detailed consultations, personalized attention, and strong communication from Dr. Pirani and his team, with care coordinator Naushin repeatedly noted for her support. Results consistently appear natural and aligned with patient goals, and recovery is described as smooth with minimal complications. Two one-star reviews stand out: one patient felt pressured to accept smaller implants against her stated goals and later regretted the outcome; another reported poor communication, dismissive attitudes, and disappointing results. The clinic's response to criticism via public replies has also drawn comment. The overwhelming majority praise both the surgeon's skill and the office culture, though transparency around surgical philosophy and implant sizing strategy emerges as a gap for some.

All six reviews rate the clinic five stars. Patients consistently praise Dr. Roskies for natural results that enhance without overdoing it, honest assessments during consultation, and attentive follow-up care that makes them feel valued rather than rushed through. No complaints are evident in the input.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Power and her all-female team for thorough consultations, professional expertise, and genuine care that makes them feel empowered and comfortable throughout surgery and recovery. The clinic excels at explaining options without pressure, offering natural results, and providing attentive follow-up. Exceptions report appointment delays, strict cancellation rules, and frustration when requesting revisions or feeling dismissed about concerns. Services span breast work, labiaplasty, eyelid and ear surgery, and scar revision. Prices start at $2,960 for labiaplasty and $11,200 for breast augmentation. Some patients waited six weeks for appointments or experienced long waits on the day; one felt the practice was disorganized and Dr. Power unavailable during aftercare.

Reviewers consistently describe transformative outcomes sustained over years, with Dr. Carmen earning trust for discouraging unnecessary procedures and prioritizing patient goals over sales. Staff expertise shines through overnight monitoring, detailed pre-surgery consultation, and follow-up calls within 24 hours of discharge. Named team members (Sharuta, Marycar, Alicia, Anita) appear repeatedly across reviews. Breast augmentation and reconstructive surgery dominate feedback, with patients noting minimal scarring and fast recovery. The practice draws referrals from friends and medical professionals. No complaints surfaced.

Most people return repeatedly to Teresa for lip filler and Botox, citing her knowledge, honest advice against over-treatment, and skill at natural results. The few complaints centre on rushed visits and a strict cancellation policy that one client felt was applied aggressively.

Many clients praise the clinic's thorough consultations, gentle staff, and welcoming atmosphere, especially during initial appointments. However, recurring complaints about product potency, inconsistent pricing, poor post-treatment communication, and a sales-driven culture create frustration despite strong initial experiences. The clinic offers injectable and non-surgical body treatments. Staff like nurse Selena are frequently mentioned for care and gentleness. Several reviews raise concerns about Botox lasting shorter than expected and possible dilution, alongside difficult payment-processing, weak aftercare guidance, and a disconnect between pre-sale effort and post-treatment support.

Dr. Sleightholm's clinic earns consistent praise for surgical skill, genuine aftercare-including post-op calls and same-week text check-ins-and a staff that patients name by first name. One outlier complaint claims poor results, but 13 of 14 recent positive reviews highlight his calm demeanor and detailed follow-up care as rare finds.

Strong surgical outcomes earn praise from most reviewers, especially for specialized cases like keloid removal and liposuction. Dr. Sapra and Dr. Khanna receive consistent mention for knowledge, skill, and minimal scarring. However, a subset of patients report billing errors (double-charged for treatments around $2,500), disorganized scheduling, rushed appointments under five minutes, and unresponsive management. Front desk professionalism varies, and aftercare guidance is inconsistent despite high treatment costs.

Across 15 recent reviews all five-star, patients consistently praise Dr. Alolabi's surgical skill and compassionate approach to hand, wrist, and reconstructive work. Cases span carpal tunnel release, trigger finger repair, Dupuytren's contracture, trauma reconstruction, and minor facial procedures; reviewers report minimal pain, excellent scarring, and clear communication from both the surgeon and front desk staff.

Five-star reviewers praise Dr. Ng's hand surgery expertise, clear communication before and after procedures, and calm demeanor. However, one-star reviews detail poor surgical outcomes (ganglion cysts recurring, trigger finger worsening after surgery) and describe him as rude or dismissive when patients report ongoing pain or complications. The divide is sharp: successful cases yield gratitude and strong recommendations; failed cases report months of worsening symptoms, long follow-up waits at Brampton Civic Hospital, and feeling disrespected when seeking help.

Most patients praise Dr. Leila Kasrai's surgical skill and her attentive, patient approach; staff members Eva and Helen are consistently named as warm and responsive. A small fraction report serious communication failures during post-operative complications, including inadequate emergency guidance and insufficient advance explanation of procedures.

Every review across four years is five stars. Patients consistently describe Dr. Amir Khakshaee (Dr. K) as knowledgeable and patient, explaining procedures in detail and respecting their goals for natural results. Staff follow up after appointments, and the clinic itself is described as clean, inviting, and aesthetically pleasing.

Most patients report excellent results from breast reduction and hand surgery, with early post-op satisfaction and minimal scarring. However, a few describe incomplete procedures or felt the surgeon was dismissive of concerns, and some found additional service fees and liposuction costs steep for the value.

All 15 reviews award five stars. Patients consistently praise Dr. Borsuk's surgical skill, particularly the cleanliness of scarring and precision of work across tummy tucks, breast work, and reconstructive procedures. His calm, attentive manner and responsive team-staff members Christine and Tasha are named-stand out as major strengths, especially for nervous patients.

Most patients report excellent results and caring attention, especially for breast reduction and augmentation. Some have faced significant scarring, unaddressed surgical complications, or felt rushed during follow-ups; a few raised concerns about clarity on sizing and unexpected fees added to OHIP-covered procedures.

Dr. Boyd's clinic earns strong marks for thoughtful consultation, skilled work, and a team that makes patients feel heard and cared for. One reviewer waited over a year for a revision appointment with unresolved concerns, tempering the otherwise consistent praise for professionalism and results.

Staff earn consistent praise for warmth and attentiveness across consultations, recovery, and follow-up. However, two older reviews flag communication breakdowns and lost records; one patient waited two years without response on a revision after a surgeon left.

Reviewers consistently report feeling heard and well-informed during consultations, with Dr. Tutino taking time to explain options rather than rushing patients. His work spans hand surgery, cyst removal, breast procedures, reconstruction, and cosmetic cases; staff follow up by phone after procedures and remain accessible for questions throughout recovery. Limited detail is available on pricing or specific cosmetic outcomes in these reviews; the evidence is stronger for reconstructive and minor surgical work than for injectables or non-surgical treatments.

Dr. Avram earns consistently high marks for surgical skill, listening during consultations, and readily available aftercare. Most patients report natural-looking results and fast healing. One detailed complaint describes a breast implant exchange where asymmetry discussed preoperatively was not addressed, leading to complications and an unexpected revision charge.

Most patients report thorough consultations, natural results, and staff who treat them as individuals rather than appointment slots. Dr. Marc Dupéré and his team (Bruna, Elizabeth, Jay, Ray) are regularly praised for genuine care during recovery and follow-up. However, a small group describe severe, lasting complications from facial and implant procedures that went unaddressed after initial post-op visits, with phone calls going unanswered and no follow-up support offered when problems emerged. The clinic excels at injectable work and body procedures for many, but facial surgery and implant cases carry documented risk of poor outcomes without adequate aftercare response. Patients report the facility is clean and welcoming, with thoughtful recovery details. The divide is sharp: those with successful surgeries become lifelong patients; those facing complications feel abandoned.

Reviewers consistently praise Dr. Shahram and the team for delivering natural-looking results and professional service. All eight five-star reviews highlight technical skill, friendly atmosphere, and patient confidence in the outcomes.

Most patients report excellent outcomes with rhinoplasty and fillers, praising natural results and caring follow-up. However, a small number describe serious complications: one patient experienced eyelid closure issues and severe dry eye after lower lid surgery, another faced respiratory problems and asymmetry after rhinoplasty, and a third reported infection and unmanaged post-op pain. The polarized reviews (73% five-star, 25% one/two-star) reflect inconsistent surgical results.

Most reviewers report strong surgical outcomes with minimal scarring, particularly for skin cancer and reconstructive work. Staff professionalism and facility quality earn consistent praise, though some note Dr. Evans can be brusque and a handful of patients have had negative experiences with the receptionist or rigid scheduling policies.

Patients consistently credit Dr. Brown with exceptional surgical results and life-changing outcomes, particularly in breast work. His approach combines technical skill with genuine care: he listens closely during consultation, explains procedures clearly, and maintains engaged follow-up from surgery day through recovery. The team (staff like Krysta, Melanie, Paulina, and aesthetician Taylor) is praised for warmth and organization. However, a small number flag poor results with facial injectables and concern about the practice's response to complaints.

Dr. Kouchakan, Dr. Shafiee, and their team earn consistent praise for listening carefully and explaining procedures in clear language. Staff members like Bahareh, Jessica, Nazani, and Sahar are repeatedly noted for warmth and gentleness during treatments. The main friction point is appointment scheduling, which reviewers found cumbersome and insensitive to patients coming in with medical concerns. Iron infusion services feature prominently in recent feedback, alongside endoscopy and consultation visits. The clinic maintains a clean, welcoming space. Some patients reported lost referral documents and frustration with the booking process, though medical care itself received high marks across all named providers.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Wallman's surgical skill, attentiveness to concerns, and caring staff. Several report life-changing results in breast and eyelid work. However, a meaningful minority describe unmet expectations (breast reductions smaller than requested), long-term complications requiring revision elsewhere, and receptionist friction. High cost compounds disappointment when results fall short. Clear gaps exist between positive and negative accounts. Some attribute complications to patient selection or recovery variability; others feel dismissed when raising concerns. Staff quality is praised in many reviews but questioned in others.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Jumaily for natural results, warmth, and careful listening, especially for injectables and facial feminization. Two serious complaints describe surgical failures requiring multiple revisions, unresolved infections, and refund disputes that left patients without compensation despite repeated procedures and travel costs.

Patients report Dr. Atiyah delivers skilled surgical results and genuine care through most interactions, with Nicole consistently praised for warm, responsive support. However, a handful describe him as dismissive during consultations, and one family experienced tension over work-injury documentation and perceived insensitivity, raising questions about consistency in patient respect across complex cases.

Across 11 reviews spanning seven years, patients credit Dr. Brandt with combining technical precision and genuine care; multiple report dramatic improvements in scars, deformities, and tumour removal with results they describe as nearly invisible. His calm demeanour, detailed pre-surgery explanations, and hands-on follow-up (phone calls, scheduled check-ins) appear to set him apart.

Staff are genuinely knowledgeable and attentive, with follow-up care that goes beyond expectation. Results are visible across skin treatments and injectables, though scheduling can be restrictive and some customers report unmet expectations after upselling.

Dr. Golger's clinic earns consistent five-star praise for breast augmentation, reduction, and lift work, with patients noting his honesty about what's possible and his willingness to revise cases free if needed. Staff members Josie and Tammi are mentioned by name for their warmth and support throughout the process. However, gynecomastia and body contouring patients report significant regret: inadequate gland removal, poor liposuction results, visible indentation, and sagging that persists years later. Several cite major pricing shifts mid-way and one patient notes being pressured into liposuction against their stated preference.

Most patients report smooth procedures and excellent bedside manner, with Dr. Weinberg earning particular praise for explaining options clearly and creating comfort during treatment. Results often exceed expectations, and staff interactions shape the positive experience. However, a significant minority cite substantial problems: long waits at appointments, forgotten in exam rooms, unanswered complaints after botched work, and complaints dismissed post-surgery despite complications including infection and chronic pain. The gap between best and worst experiences is stark. Five-star reviewers consistently mention aesthetic precision and supportive recovery, while those who struggled faced administrative lapses and unaddressed medical concerns. Wait times and follow-up care appear inconsistent across visits, suggesting operational gaps even when clinical skill is strong.

Most reviewers describe Dr. Tai as exceptionally attentive, explaining complex procedures clearly and answering questions patiently at appointments. Patients consistently praised his diagnostic depth, clinical skill, and genuine care across septoplasty, reconstructive work following injury, and ENT procedures. However, multiple recent reviews note the practice has closed as Dr. Tai relocated to the US. Earlier reviews documented successful outcomes in nasal surgery, ear procedures, and functional repairs; staff and surgical teams received praise for professionalism. The strong positive track record is now historical.

Five-star reviewers praise Dr. De Kleer's surgical skill, clear communication, and Michele's expertise with injectables; post-op care from nurses like Karen and Nurse Gottwald is frequently highlighted. However, one-star reviewers report serious surgical botches (breast reduction requiring in-home nursing, submental liposuction causing new lumps 1.5 years later), dismissal of complications, and upselling of treatments that caused permanent scarring, with management refusing to address complaints. The clinic excels in non-surgical services like CoolSculpting and laser treatments for engaged patients. Surgery appears to carry significant risk with this practice, based on multiple accounts of avoidable harm and lack of accountability.

Most patients praise Dr. Lista and Dr. Austin's technical skill and the team's attentiveness, with many reporting dramatic transformations and smooth recoveries. However, several recent reviews report missed 4-6 month post-op appointments, extreme rippling across multiple patients implanted in the same location, large scars, and unresponsive communication when issues arise after discharge.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Willoughby's surgical expertise and compassionate approach, particularly for breast reconstruction and reduction. Patients feel heard during consultations and report excellent results. However, some experienced significant problems: reception rudeness, communication delays when complications arose, and one patient dealt with post-surgical infection that was initially dismissed; staff responses have been uneven.

Dr. Sleightholm and his team deliver polished consultations and skillful minor procedures, earning consistent praise for the clinic's cleanliness and staff warmth. However, a minority of patients report unresolved breast surgery complications, inadequate follow-up, and dismissive responses to concerns, creating tension between the positive routine experience and serious gaps when outcomes disappoint. Strengths cluster around liposuction, lipoma removal, tummy tucks, and non-surgical work (facials, skin treatments). Staff members Cristina, Brigitte, Priscilla, and Richa are named frequently for attentive care. The practice states it was founded in 1994 and holds Royal College board certification. Caution is warranted for major breast procedures, where communication and accountability appear inconsistent.

A split record: older five-star reviews praise the surgical team's skill and bedside manner, especially for post-weight-loss reconstruction. Recent one-star reviews report significant scar and body contouring regrets years later, with patients turned away to other surgeons for revision work.

Most reviewers praise the friendly staff and clean environment, with particular mention of smooth iron infusion visits and quick appointment times. One substantial complaint detailed misleading website pricing for rhinoplasty, unauthorized consultation charges, and inability to verify a surgeon's credentials or see his work, though the clinic later refunded the fee.

Anna and her team deliver personalized skincare treatments that reviewers say noticeably improve their complexion. Many have been returning for years, citing her expertise and the calm clinic environment.

Most long-term patients praise the expertise of Drs. Edstrom and Lemckert, along with attentive staff follow-up. However, recent reviews flag inconsistent reception service, unresponsive staff to voicemails, and complaints about treatment failures and confusing appointment policies. Evidence is limited to 27 Google reviews, with a stark divide between five-star loyalty and one/two-star frustration over operational friction.

Outcomes divide sharply. Some patients report excellent long-term results from breast reduction, tummy tuck, and reconstruction. Others faced rude interactions, year-long silence between consultation and surgery date, botched procedures (inverted nipples, uneven abdomen, thick scars), and refusals to correct problems. The office mixes up appointments, keeps incorrect patient records, and runs severely behind schedule. Review evidence is limited: only 30 texts cover 31 total reviews, with older accounts potentially confusing Dr. Wong with Dr. Vanessa Wong. Recent 1-star reviews cite specific failures (weight-focused pressure, communication breakdown weeks before surgery, no follow-up for 11-year-old surgical errors), while 5-star reviews from 4-6 years ago express strong satisfaction with results. This suggests recent operational or interpersonal decline.

Dr. Jalil commands strong loyalty among most patients: those undergoing cosmetic procedures, cancer reconstruction, and gender-affirming work consistently praise his calm demeanor, ability to deliver natural results, and hands-on aftercare. However, a detailed 1-star review documents a reconstructive mastectomy with DIEP flap where nipple preservation was not honored, symmetry fell short of expectations, the patient suffered a serious pneumothorax requiring ICU admission, and the discharge summary omitted this adverse event. That reviewer emphasizes concerns about informed consent and procedural transparency, not aesthetic outcome alone. The clinic attracts patients from outside Ontario (Alberta, beyond) based on reputation. Staff and facility details are consistently praised. Dr. Jalil is described as unhurried, attentive to individual goals, and skilled at explaining options and recovery requirements. The gap between the dominant five-star pattern and the one detailed complaint suggests that outcome variability or communication breakdown can occur, particularly in complex reconstructive work.

Dr. Wu's patients consistently praise his surgical precision and calm, attentive manner during consultations and recovery. Hand and tendon reconstruction dominates the positive feedback, with one patient regaining thumb function in three months; staff coordination earns repeated mention for smooth appointments and thoughtful follow-ups.

Dr. Jordan's technical skill in eye surgery and reconstructive procedures draws strong praise, particularly from patients with complex conditions like Graves disease or cancer-related removal. Yet a sharp split emerges: satisfied patients highlight minimal pain, skilled nursing, and thorough aftercare; dissatisfied ones report he becomes defensive when questioned, refuses second procedures patients request, and has terminated relationships with patients seeking clarification on treatment. Office staff inconsistency and cancellation policies add friction.

Strong track record across multiple procedures: breast surgery, hand reconstruction, and body contouring earn consistent five-star praise for technical skill and staff warmth. Office is clean and attentive during consultations, though some patients report minimal post-op guidance after hand work and past friction over deposit policies.

York Vein Clinic earns strong praise for Dr. Kritzinger's deep expertise in treating varicose veins with laser and sclerotherapy, backed by knowledgeable staff like Bonnie, Sue, and Christa. Most reviewers describe lasting results and careful follow-up, though a few report poor outcomes on facial veins and occasional billing or communication gaps that left them frustrated.

Surgical patients consistently report strong results and excellent bedside manner from senior doctors and nursing staff. However, the clinic struggles with laser treatments, long appointment delays, and occasional serious complications; some patients cite permanent injury and unresolved complaints about refunds or compensation.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Panchapakesan's technical skill and bedside manner, noting minimal scarring and compassionate care. However, several one- and two-star reviews document serious concerns: wound infections not properly escalated, dismissive phone responses when complications arose, and in one case, a patient's wounds deteriorated after the office recommended continuing unsuccessful treatment. The surgeon himself consistently receives high marks; concerns centre on aftercare response and office management during emergencies.

Patients report stark contrasts: some experienced compassionate, meticulous care through major reconstructive surgery, while others faced uneven body-contouring results, delayed revisions, and communication breakdowns that required legal involvement. Evidence is limited to a handful of recent reviews.

Both reviewers praise Dr. Mark Baily and staff member Karyn for genuine care and detailed explanations before and after procedures. Long-term focus on patient comfort and pain relief, with responsive aftercare support.

La Fontaine draws strong loyalty from satisfied patients, who praise the clinic's professionalism, clean environment, and staff warmth. However, a subset of long-term clients report persistent complications across multiple procedures, requiring costly revisions without resolution, raising questions about consistency and follow-up care.

Strong results and team care draw patients, particularly for reconstructive work and cancer-related surgery. However, a vocal minority report poor results, lack of aesthetic consultation, and brusque communication-especially around breast procedures and complex cases outside the surgeon's stated focus.

Five-star reviews praise Dr. Brownrigg's rhinoplasties and non-surgical work (Botox noted as consistently excellent), plus scar-prevention expertise. One-star reviews center on rhinoplasties that looked unchanged from pre-surgery, despite 3D imaging promises and thousands spent. Patients reported steroid injections offered but ineffective, and say concerns were dismissed rather than addressed constructively. Evidence is thin overall: detail limited to recent rhinoplasty failures, Botox praise, facelift satisfaction, and reconstructive breathing improvements.

All four reviews rate the clinic five stars. Dr. Weinberg and his team earn consistent praise for technical skill, clear communication, and natural outcomes across filler, reconstruction, and body contouring procedures.

Dr. Hong's surgical skills and staff care earn consistent five-star praise, especially for reconstructive and cosmetic work; patients report feeling heard and supported through complex procedures. However, waits of one to two and a half hours are routine, and reception staff frequently fail to follow through on promises, leaving patients frustrated and distrustful of scheduling accuracy. \n\nReviewers single out the nursing team (especially Lin and Stella) for attentiveness and skill. Dr. Hong himself is described as efficient, observant, and able to explain procedures clearly. Patients note natural results across body contouring, facial work, and gender-affirming procedures. The clinic is located at 302 Sheppard Ave West and operates seven days; staff speak English and Cantonese. Cost is mentioned as reasonable relative to outcomes, but no specific prices appear in reviews.

Limited review evidence: two five-star ratings over 8 years praise Dr. Bailey's empathy and a staff member named Guri, but concrete details about services or results are sparse.

All five reviews praise Dr. Gantous for rhinoplasty work, noting his technical precision and attentive approach. Patients highlight his use of 3D imaging, detailed preoperative counselling, responsive email communication, and willingness to combine procedures when beneficial to facial balance.

Strong surgeons, inconsistent patient experience. Dr. Weinberg earns consistent praise for reconstructive work, breast surgery, and noticeable results; multiple patients report traveling from across the GTA and calling him an artist. However, a meaningful minority experienced dismissive, rushed, or outright rude encounters during consultations and follow-ups, with some complaints going unresolved for months. Aftercare stands out when it happens: detailed post-op instructions, email access to the doctor, monthly check-ins. Yet a few reviews note the doctor rushed through post-op appointments or refused to address specific concerns. The team includes a responsive coordinator called Sandy, though front-desk communication can falter.

Experienced rhinoplasty surgeon with a devoted following who report natural, long-lasting results and high confidence in his work. Significant cluster of unhappy revision patients, however, describe feeling unheard during consultations, repeat visits without tangible improvement, and disorganization in post-op care and communication.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Dr. Levis delivers hand surgery with lasting pain relief: reviewers report straight fingers after Dupuytren contracture repair, no pain after carpal tunnel work, and full thumb function restored years later. Her team at St. Joseph's is described as compassionate and professional.

Dr. Bell and his team earn consistent praise for breast augmentation, facial surgery, and laser treatments, with patients particularly crediting Shelby for non-surgical work and the staff for making them feel at ease. However, hair transplant reviews reveal a severe divide: several patients report significant complications, pressure during consultation, technician-led procedures, and being charged full price for fewer grafts than promised, with lasting physical and financial consequences.

Surgical outcomes and Dr. Platt's expertise draw consistent five-star praise. Yet a polarized rating split (48% five-star, 48% one-two-star) reflects deep frustration with front desk conduct. Patients report exceptional care during consultations and procedures, but encounter rude, dismissive receptionists, ignored voicemails, and refusal to send confirmation emails. Receptionist Evelyn receives individual praise when involved; other staff create barriers to booking and follow-up.

All 15 reviews are five-star. Patients consistently report that Dr. Best listens carefully, explains procedures clearly, and delivers results that exceed expectations-from rhinoplasty breathing improvements to nearly invisible scar revision. Her team, including assistant Shanthi, creates a welcoming clinic atmosphere.

Most patients report strong results and warm staff interactions, particularly from named team members Liz, Diana, Shannon, and Jenn. However, a handful of older reviews flag inconsistent bedside manner during consultations and revision surgeries, especially with ear procedures.

Strong results on body and facial procedures from certain surgeons offset by mixed experiences with wait times, pricing clarity, and some surgical complications. Injections and chemical peels consistently praised; administrative friction and old satellite locations mentioned by reviewers.

Reviewers consistently praise Dr. Roumeliotis and his team for managing complex facial reconstruction after trauma, with particular note of emotional support during recovery. Limited review detail prevents assessment of broader service quality, wait times, or cosmetic procedure outcomes.

The clinic divides sharply. Patients treated by Dr. Rathee or in shorter-wait visits praise genuine listening and effective treatment; Dr. Mani Raman receives consistent complaints of rudeness, dismissiveness, and appointments that last 3-5 minutes despite 40-minute-plus waits. The core frustration is the gap between long wait times and very brief time with the doctor. Staff and front-desk issues compound the problem. Booking calls go unanswered, appointment administration makes errors, and the clinic seems aware of wait times but takes no meaningful action. A few patients report pleasant, punctual experiences, but they are far outnumbered by those who feel unheard, rushed, and disrespected.

Five-star reviewers praise Dr. Lista's expertise and staff warmth, but negative reviews spanning years dominate: botched breast augmentations, infections left untreated, 45-minute to 90-minute waits without updates, and a pattern of dismissive behavior during consultations. Several patients report sagging, asymmetry, or uneven scarring months to years post-op, and costs escalate sharply from phone quotes ($14,000) to final bills ($26,555+).

Tanya at TBT delivers consistent results with Dysport, Botox, and Morpheus8 treatments in a welcoming clinic. Most clients report she listens carefully and avoids overselling; a small minority experienced missed appointments and excessive injectables causing discomfort and confusion about dosing.

Both reviewers report excellent outcomes and attentive care. Evidence is limited to two five-star reviews, but they emphasize surgical skill, listening to patient preferences, and a supportive team.

Five-star reviews praise Dr. Haywood's surgical skill and warm approach, especially for breast reduction, with patients noting excellent scars and seamless experiences. One-star reviews flag delayed communication on post-op problems, rushed appointments, and inconsistent follow-up support when complications arose.

All ten reviews rate Aestheticare five stars. Patients return for Dr. Lozenski's refusal to over-treat and her staff's warmth; acne and skin concerns improve markedly with peels and IPL.

Dr. Zhang's surgical skill, especially in microsurgery and scar minimization, earns strong praise from patients satisfied with reconstruction outcomes. However, multiple reviewers report abrupt, dismissive, or condescending interactions during consultations and procedures, incomplete postop communication, and follow-up that sometimes fell short of promises.

Most satisfied patients praise Dr. Hynes' skill, the staff's warmth (especially Karen at front desk), and smooth healing. Yet serious gaps emerge: one patient experienced asymmetry after abdominoplasty with zero follow-up from the clinic despite repeated contact; phone lines are consistently busy or divert to an unrelated device seller; and complications go unaddressed. Past reviews glow, but recent ones flag a stark decline in accountability and communication. Since review evidence is limited, note that detail provided here reflects only these 17 reviews.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Chitte's surgical skill, especially for hand trauma and breast reconstruction, noting his patience and careful listening. However, a persistent thread of complaints spans years: delayed or missing referrals to physio and family doctors, unreturned voicemails, and long in-office waits. Administrative friction appears to have worsened after a clinic transition.

Dr. Turley receives consistently strong praise for bedside manner and reconstructive hand surgery, with several patients reporting excellent healing from trauma and functional repairs. However, a vocal minority report poor cosmetic results, overly deep incisions for minor procedures, and significant office access issues. The clinic's automated phone system does not accept messages, and multiple patients describe arriving to find the office closed during posted hours or being turned away after surgeries were cancelled.

Overwhelmingly poor reviews describe a clinic marked by extensive wait times, poor listening skills, and unhappy surgical outcomes. One outdated five-star review praised quick nasal bone correction, but seven recent one-star reviews report botched rhinoplasties, staff rudeness, and Dr. Hacker's dismissal of patient concerns.

Limited review evidence available for Verso Surgery. The business operates as a fully licensed facility in Old Toronto, offering facial and body procedures including facelift, rhinoplasty, breast augmentation, and non-surgical options.

Review evidence is limited. The business states it is board-certified with over 23 years of surgical experience, hospital privileges at three major Ontario networks, and past leadership in plastic surgery. Services span body contouring, breast surgery, non-surgical cosmetics, and gender-affirming procedures across the GTA and beyond.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.

Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.