Plastic Surgeon in Ontario

Patients consistently credit Dr. Brown with exceptional surgical results and life-changing outcomes, particularly in breast work. His approach combines technical skill with genuine care: he listens closely during consultation, explains procedures clearly, and maintains engaged follow-up from surgery day through recovery. The team (staff like Krysta, Melanie, Paulina, and aesthetician Taylor) is praised for warmth and organization. However, a small number flag poor results with facial injectables and concern about the practice's response to complaints.

All eight reviewers gave five stars, praising the surgeons (Rajan, Jindal, Tutino) for thoroughness and professionalism, and staff for warmth. Patients value the detailed pre-procedure explanations and calm, welcoming atmosphere throughout their visits.

Dr. Rockwell consistently delivers strong surgical results across breast reconstruction, implant revision, and hand surgery, with reviewers repeatedly highlighting her thorough explanations and genuine care throughout the patient journey. Her team maintains the same attentive standard from first appointment through follow-up, making complex cases feel supported and well-managed.

Patients consistently praise Dr. Mahoney for her surgical skill, emotional support, and detailed follow-up appointments. Her staff, especially Noosheen at reception, earns repeated mentions for responsiveness and warmth. Wait times for initial consultations stretch beyond 18 months for OHIP-covered procedures, and several one-star reviews cite administrative delays and staff communication lapses.

Patients consistently praise Dr. Chivers' surgical skill and compassionate approach, with staff named repeatedly for warmth and support across body contouring and breast procedures. A persistent booking concern involves misleading "free consultation" advertising that then requires a $200 e-transfer deposit, and some report significant wait times despite confirmed appointment slots.

Many patients report Dr. Elahi delivers precise, natural-looking results and takes genuine time during consultations. His team, when engaged, earns consistent praise for warmth and attentiveness. However, a meaningful minority describe serious complications (botched breast lifts, weight regain after liposuction) that were not adequately explained beforehand or remedied afterward. Office staff interactions-particularly with Samantha-have left several patients feeling dismissed or unsupported during critical decision points. Specific procedures praised include rhinoplasty, breast reduction, and scar revision, with reviewers noting minimal pain and smooth recovery. But the gap between surgical skill and pre-operative communication, combined with handling of adverse outcomes, creates genuine hesitation for prospective patients considering revision cases or more involved procedures.

Most patients praise Dr. Lista and Dr. Austin's technical skill and the team's attentiveness, with many reporting dramatic transformations and smooth recoveries. However, several recent reviews report missed 4-6 month post-op appointments, extreme rippling across multiple patients implanted in the same location, large scars, and unresponsive communication when issues arise after discharge.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Willoughby's surgical expertise and compassionate approach, particularly for breast reconstruction and reduction. Patients feel heard during consultations and report excellent results. However, some experienced significant problems: reception rudeness, communication delays when complications arose, and one patient dealt with post-surgical infection that was initially dismissed; staff responses have been uneven.

Most patients praise Dr. Leila Kasrai's surgical skill and her attentive, patient approach; staff members Eva and Helen are consistently named as warm and responsive. A small fraction report serious communication failures during post-operative complications, including inadequate emergency guidance and insufficient advance explanation of procedures.

Patients report Dr. Bendago listens carefully and delivers results that exceed expectations. Recovery support stands out: staff check in regularly, lymphatic massage therapist Rasha helps manage swelling, and receptionists Raiza and Melanie handle logistics with warmth. A small number of reviews flag poor communication from office staff and one complaint about surgical outcome, but the overwhelming majority describe a team that genuinely cares and makes the experience painless. Breast procedures dominate the positive feedback (reduction, augmentation, fat transfer). Dr. Bendago's availability and willingness to explain every step build confidence. Even patients with language barriers felt supported. The clinic runs on time, and post-op follow-ups are consistent and thorough.

Five-star reviews highlight Nurse Lisa's artistry with fillers and the clinic's welcoming atmosphere and natural results, particularly for injectables and laser treatments. However, surgical patients report serious complications including nostril deformity after rhinoplasty and overly tight eyelids after blepharoplasty, with the surgeon allegedly dismissing concerns and ignoring follow-up contact. The clinic charges premium rates despite these documented surgical failures.

Five reviewers gave five-star ratings over the past year. Most praise Dr. Rice's technical skill and the simplicity of the procedure, noting 30 to 45 minute appointments with minimal bruising and manageable pain. Recovery was easier than expected, and patients reported being satisfied with results.

Most patients report exceptional outcomes and a supportive team, with Dr. Rival praised for respecting facial harmony and crafting natural results. However, a small number describe rushed, dismissive consultations and, in isolated cases, unaddressed complications and poor follow-up, with at least one patient reporting both breathing difficulties and aesthetic dissatisfaction years post-op. Strengths centre on septorhinoplasty and revision rhinoplasty work, where reviewers highlight combined functional and cosmetic gains. His practice operates with named staff (Mandy, Lynn, Lyne mentioned), thorough pre- and post-op guidance, and a calm clinic environment. Concerns surface around consultation pacing and responsiveness to revision requests.

Most patients report excellent results from breast reduction and hand surgery, with early post-op satisfaction and minimal scarring. However, a few describe incomplete procedures or felt the surgeon was dismissive of concerns, and some found additional service fees and liposuction costs steep for the value.

Most patients report excellent outcomes with careful consultation, minimal complications, and warm care throughout recovery. A small but serious group experienced surgical errors, particularly over-aggressive eyelid work and filler mishaps, followed by dismissal of concerns and no meaningful revision options offered. Most surgeries here are rhinoplasty and eyelid procedures. When things go well, results feel natural and staff stay involved post-op. The main caveat: eyelid surgery carries documented risk of over-removal, and the clinic has not clearly addressed these failures in public responses.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Chan for skillful hand and wrist work, especially trigger finger releases and carpal tunnel surgery, with patients noting excellent healing and minimal scars. His warm demeanor and patient explanations earn consistent mentions, though a few flag office accessibility and one complaint about unwillingness to refer elsewhere for conditions outside his scope.

All 15 reviews award five stars. Patients consistently praise Dr. Borsuk's surgical skill, particularly the cleanliness of scarring and precision of work across tummy tucks, breast work, and reconstructive procedures. His calm, attentive manner and responsive team-staff members Christine and Tasha are named-stand out as major strengths, especially for nervous patients.

Anna and her team deliver personalized skincare treatments that reviewers say noticeably improve their complexion. Many have been returning for years, citing her expertise and the calm clinic environment.

Patients consistently praise Dr. Adibfar's surgical expertise and the clinic's warm, professional team across rhinoplasty, breast, and body procedures. Esthetician services (Fractora, Forma, laser treatments) and post-operative care like massage therapy and lymphatic drainage draw strong loyalty. One complaint from several years back cited refused post-op appointments and clinic understaffing during high-demand periods.

Dr. Jalil commands strong loyalty among most patients: those undergoing cosmetic procedures, cancer reconstruction, and gender-affirming work consistently praise his calm demeanor, ability to deliver natural results, and hands-on aftercare. However, a detailed 1-star review documents a reconstructive mastectomy with DIEP flap where nipple preservation was not honored, symmetry fell short of expectations, the patient suffered a serious pneumothorax requiring ICU admission, and the discharge summary omitted this adverse event. That reviewer emphasizes concerns about informed consent and procedural transparency, not aesthetic outcome alone. The clinic attracts patients from outside Ontario (Alberta, beyond) based on reputation. Staff and facility details are consistently praised. Dr. Jalil is described as unhurried, attentive to individual goals, and skilled at explaining options and recovery requirements. The gap between the dominant five-star pattern and the one detailed complaint suggests that outcome variability or communication breakdown can occur, particularly in complex reconstructive work.

Steven A. Hanna holds a 5.0 rating across 80 Google reviews with 99% five-star scores. Without individual review text, the depth of what patients praise cannot be detailed here.

Most patients describe transformative experiences with McLean's warm, attentive team and skilled surgeons, particularly for gender-affirming top surgery. One significant negative review documented surgical complications (asymmetry, nipple stretching, dog ears) that the patient felt were neither discussed beforehand nor adequately addressed during follow-up, tempting buyers to probe pre-op conversations about expected outcomes and revision policies.

Most patients report excellent results and caring attention, especially for breast reduction and augmentation. Some have faced significant scarring, unaddressed surgical complications, or felt rushed during follow-ups; a few raised concerns about clarity on sizing and unexpected fees added to OHIP-covered procedures.

Most patients report exceptional experiences: rhinoplasties and revisions yield natural results, breathing improves, and the team is genuinely attentive from consultation through recovery. A small but vocal minority faced lasting complications-asymmetry, persistent pain, infections, and nerve damage-that went unaddressed despite Dr. Gantous being aware of their concerns. Success appears strongest for straightforward rhinoplasties and some revision cases; outcomes are less predictable for complex reconstructions or when pre-existing conditions exist. Strength lies in his expertise with saddle nose deformity and post-cleft cases. The clinic's front desk (Vanessa) and nursing staff are consistently praised.

Dr. Wu's patients consistently praise his surgical precision and calm, attentive manner during consultations and recovery. Hand and tendon reconstruction dominates the positive feedback, with one patient regaining thumb function in three months; staff coordination earns repeated mention for smooth appointments and thoughtful follow-ups.

Dr. Sleightholm's clinic earns consistent praise for surgical skill, genuine aftercare-including post-op calls and same-week text check-ins-and a staff that patients name by first name. One outlier complaint claims poor results, but 13 of 14 recent positive reviews highlight his calm demeanor and detailed follow-up care as rare finds.

Surgical patients consistently report strong results and excellent bedside manner from senior doctors and nursing staff. However, the clinic struggles with laser treatments, long appointment delays, and occasional serious complications; some patients cite permanent injury and unresolved complaints about refunds or compensation.

Most patients report Dr. Maleki combines technical skill with genuine care, delivering natural-looking blepharoplasty and fat transfer results with strong follow-up support. A minority describe major misalignment between consultation goals and actual surgical outcome, along with dismissive staff responses when challenging results. The clinic's non-surgical offerings (laser, Botox, fillers) and surgical aftercare earn consistent praise. Named staff like Christina, Kay, Sunny, and Hatel draw specific mention for responsiveness and skill. Two detailed negative reviews cite aggressive skin excision beyond agreed limits and misleading laser package sales tactics.

All 12 reviews are five-star. Patients describe Dr. Binhammer as a specialist in complex hand injuries and repair, with repeated mentions of finger reattachment, Dupuytren's contracture treatment, and arthritis-related hand surgery. Multiple reviewers note barely visible scars and full restoration of hand function. Staff are praised as excellent and supportive.

All six reviews rate the clinic five stars. Patients consistently praise Dr. Roskies for natural results that enhance without overdoing it, honest assessments during consultation, and attentive follow-up care that makes them feel valued rather than rushed through. No complaints are evident in the input.

Patients consistently walk away without pain and with confidence in Dr. Staibano's skill and bedside manner. From front desk to OR, staff members (Diane, Leanna, Monica, Kayla, Jordan, Amanda) are named with genuine warmth. Wisdom teeth and extractions dominate the caseload. The office is spotless, modern, and appointments run on time. Evolve specializes in oral and maxillofacial surgery, operating under general anesthesia and sedation. The practice shines in extraction recovery and implant surgery prep. No negative feedback appears in recent reviews; the only caveat is that cosmetic and breast services are not mentioned in any review, leaving those directory categories unsupported by patient evidence.

Most patients report thorough consultations, natural results, and staff who treat them as individuals rather than appointment slots. Dr. Marc Dupéré and his team (Bruna, Elizabeth, Jay, Ray) are regularly praised for genuine care during recovery and follow-up. However, a small group describe severe, lasting complications from facial and implant procedures that went unaddressed after initial post-op visits, with phone calls going unanswered and no follow-up support offered when problems emerged. The clinic excels at injectable work and body procedures for many, but facial surgery and implant cases carry documented risk of poor outcomes without adequate aftercare response. Patients report the facility is clean and welcoming, with thoughtful recovery details. The divide is sharp: those with successful surgeries become lifelong patients; those facing complications feel abandoned.

Four years after extended abdominoplasty, a patient still credits Dr. Nodwell with life-changing results and the emotional confidence that followed. Across breast reductions, augmentations, implant removals, and body contouring, reviewers consistently mention his calm bedside manner, detailed explanations, and willingness to respect patient goals without upselling. His team, particularly Emily, consistently draws praise for quick responses and compassionate support throughout the process.

Turkish Trends arranges cosmetic surgery trips to Turkey, handling flights, hotels, and recovery logistics alongside procedures. Nine five-star reviews consistently praise the team's coordination, professionalism, and attention to detail from start to finish.

Dr. Golger's clinic earns consistent five-star praise for breast augmentation, reduction, and lift work, with patients noting his honesty about what's possible and his willingness to revise cases free if needed. Staff members Josie and Tammi are mentioned by name for their warmth and support throughout the process. However, gynecomastia and body contouring patients report significant regret: inadequate gland removal, poor liposuction results, visible indentation, and sagging that persists years later. Several cite major pricing shifts mid-way and one patient notes being pressured into liposuction against their stated preference.

Most patients report smooth procedures and excellent bedside manner, with Dr. Weinberg earning particular praise for explaining options clearly and creating comfort during treatment. Results often exceed expectations, and staff interactions shape the positive experience. However, a significant minority cite substantial problems: long waits at appointments, forgotten in exam rooms, unanswered complaints after botched work, and complaints dismissed post-surgery despite complications including infection and chronic pain. The gap between best and worst experiences is stark. Five-star reviewers consistently mention aesthetic precision and supportive recovery, while those who struggled faced administrative lapses and unaddressed medical concerns. Wait times and follow-up care appear inconsistent across visits, suggesting operational gaps even when clinical skill is strong.

Staff are genuinely knowledgeable and attentive, with follow-up care that goes beyond expectation. Results are visible across skin treatments and injectables, though scheduling can be restrictive and some customers report unmet expectations after upselling.

Five-star reviewers praise Dr. De Kleer's surgical skill, clear communication, and Michele's expertise with injectables; post-op care from nurses like Karen and Nurse Gottwald is frequently highlighted. However, one-star reviewers report serious surgical botches (breast reduction requiring in-home nursing, submental liposuction causing new lumps 1.5 years later), dismissal of complications, and upselling of treatments that caused permanent scarring, with management refusing to address complaints. The clinic excels in non-surgical services like CoolSculpting and laser treatments for engaged patients. Surgery appears to carry significant risk with this practice, based on multiple accounts of avoidable harm and lack of accountability.

Patients report Dr. Atiyah delivers skilled surgical results and genuine care through most interactions, with Nicole consistently praised for warm, responsive support. However, a handful describe him as dismissive during consultations, and one family experienced tension over work-injury documentation and perceived insensitivity, raising questions about consistency in patient respect across complex cases.

Dr. Sleightholm and his team deliver polished consultations and skillful minor procedures, earning consistent praise for the clinic's cleanliness and staff warmth. However, a minority of patients report unresolved breast surgery complications, inadequate follow-up, and dismissive responses to concerns, creating tension between the positive routine experience and serious gaps when outcomes disappoint. Strengths cluster around liposuction, lipoma removal, tummy tucks, and non-surgical work (facials, skin treatments). Staff members Cristina, Brigitte, Priscilla, and Richa are named frequently for attentive care. The practice states it was founded in 1994 and holds Royal College board certification. Caution is warranted for major breast procedures, where communication and accountability appear inconsistent.

Many patients report smooth procedures, skillful work, and attentive aftercare, particularly those undergoing breast reconstruction. However, a meaningful minority cite aesthetic disappointments (asymmetry, missing information about areola removal), long waits for appointments, and friction with front-desk staff who some describe as unprofessional or insistent. Strengths lie in Dr. Tang's surgical precision and her ability to calm anxious patients. Named staff members Maria and Rozana receive consistent praise for compassion. Complaints centre on inconsistent pre-surgery counselling, receptionist rudeness, and the practice's apparent difficulty managing appointment volume or communicating scheduling details accurately.

Most reviewers praise the friendly staff and clean environment, with particular mention of smooth iron infusion visits and quick appointment times. One substantial complaint detailed misleading website pricing for rhinoplasty, unauthorized consultation charges, and inability to verify a surgeon's credentials or see his work, though the clinic later refunded the fee.

Dr. Boyd's clinic earns strong marks for thoughtful consultation, skilled work, and a team that makes patients feel heard and cared for. One reviewer waited over a year for a revision appointment with unresolved concerns, tempering the otherwise consistent praise for professionalism and results.

Most reviewers praise the clinic's friendly staff, clean space, and visible results across laser and injectable treatments. Long-term clients highlight realistic consultations and skilled technicians like Heather and Allen. However, a notable minority report poor communication during intake, rough handling during procedures, and missing aftercare instructions, with one patient citing pain and excessive product usage by a specific injector. Services span laser hair removal, leg vein treatment, chemical peels, injectables (Botox, fillers), and facials. The clinic has locations in North York and Downtown, with staff availability appearing consistent. Concerns centre on inconsistent bedside manner and procedure prep rather than facility quality.

Dr. Vojvodic earns strong marks for surgical skill, patient-centered listening, and follow-up responsiveness across breast reduction, breast augmentation, and hand surgery. Her willingness to consult younger patients thoroughly and arrange personal recovery support sets her apart. Phone access to book appointments and the pace of consultations when she is busy remain sticking points for some, and one review flagged perceived dismissal of a patient's surgical preferences.

Most reviewers report strong surgical outcomes with minimal scarring, particularly for skin cancer and reconstructive work. Staff professionalism and facility quality earn consistent praise, though some note Dr. Evans can be brusque and a handful of patients have had negative experiences with the receptionist or rigid scheduling policies.

Dr. Lipa earns consistent five-star reviews for precise surgical work and compassionate care. Evidence is limited: only two reviews, though both highlight her personalized approach and strong bedside manner.

Reviewers consistently describe transformative outcomes sustained over years, with Dr. Carmen earning trust for discouraging unnecessary procedures and prioritizing patient goals over sales. Staff expertise shines through overnight monitoring, detailed pre-surgery consultation, and follow-up calls within 24 hours of discharge. Named team members (Sharuta, Marycar, Alicia, Anita) appear repeatedly across reviews. Breast augmentation and reconstructive surgery dominate feedback, with patients noting minimal scarring and fast recovery. The practice draws referrals from friends and medical professionals. No complaints surfaced.

York Vein Clinic earns strong praise for Dr. Kritzinger's deep expertise in treating varicose veins with laser and sclerotherapy, backed by knowledgeable staff like Bonnie, Sue, and Christa. Most reviewers describe lasting results and careful follow-up, though a few report poor outcomes on facial veins and occasional billing or communication gaps that left them frustrated.

Across 11 reviews spanning seven years, patients credit Dr. Brandt with combining technical precision and genuine care; multiple report dramatic improvements in scars, deformities, and tumour removal with results they describe as nearly invisible. His calm demeanour, detailed pre-surgery explanations, and hands-on follow-up (phone calls, scheduled check-ins) appear to set him apart.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Panchapakesan's technical skill and bedside manner, noting minimal scarring and compassionate care. However, several one- and two-star reviews document serious concerns: wound infections not properly escalated, dismissive phone responses when complications arose, and in one case, a patient's wounds deteriorated after the office recommended continuing unsuccessful treatment. The surgeon himself consistently receives high marks; concerns centre on aftercare response and office management during emergencies.

Reviewers praise Dr. Wanzel's surgical skill, particularly for breast procedures and minor hand surgery, along with his calm bedside manner and the responsiveness of his front desk staff. However, communication gaps are persistent: several complain of weeks-long appointment waits, unreturned calls, and unanswered emails, while a few report disappointing results or post-operative complications.

Most reviewers describe Dr. Tai as exceptionally attentive, explaining complex procedures clearly and answering questions patiently at appointments. Patients consistently praised his diagnostic depth, clinical skill, and genuine care across septoplasty, reconstructive work following injury, and ENT procedures. However, multiple recent reviews note the practice has closed as Dr. Tai relocated to the US. Earlier reviews documented successful outcomes in nasal surgery, ear procedures, and functional repairs; staff and surgical teams received praise for professionalism. The strong positive track record is now historical.

Most patients report excellent outcomes with rhinoplasty and fillers, praising natural results and caring follow-up. However, a small number describe serious complications: one patient experienced eyelid closure issues and severe dry eye after lower lid surgery, another faced respiratory problems and asymmetry after rhinoplasty, and a third reported infection and unmanaged post-op pain. The polarized reviews (73% five-star, 25% one/two-star) reflect inconsistent surgical results.

Strong results and team care draw patients, particularly for reconstructive work and cancer-related surgery. However, a vocal minority report poor results, lack of aesthetic consultation, and brusque communication-especially around breast procedures and complex cases outside the surgeon's stated focus.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Jumaily for natural results, warmth, and careful listening, especially for injectables and facial feminization. Two serious complaints describe surgical failures requiring multiple revisions, unresolved infections, and refund disputes that left patients without compensation despite repeated procedures and travel costs.

Five-star reviewers praise Dr. Ng's hand surgery expertise, clear communication before and after procedures, and calm demeanor. However, one-star reviews detail poor surgical outcomes (ganglion cysts recurring, trigger finger worsening after surgery) and describe him as rude or dismissive when patients report ongoing pain or complications. The divide is sharp: successful cases yield gratitude and strong recommendations; failed cases report months of worsening symptoms, long follow-up waits at Brampton Civic Hospital, and feeling disrespected when seeking help.

All four reviews rate the clinic five stars. Dr. Weinberg and his team earn consistent praise for technical skill, clear communication, and natural outcomes across filler, reconstruction, and body contouring procedures.

One five-star review praises Dr. Strazar for professionalism and pain-free results. Limited review evidence available.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Wallman's surgical skill, attentiveness to concerns, and caring staff. Several report life-changing results in breast and eyelid work. However, a meaningful minority describe unmet expectations (breast reductions smaller than requested), long-term complications requiring revision elsewhere, and receptionist friction. High cost compounds disappointment when results fall short. Clear gaps exist between positive and negative accounts. Some attribute complications to patient selection or recovery variability; others feel dismissed when raising concerns. Staff quality is praised in many reviews but questioned in others.

Two five-star reviews praise Dr. Tutino's gyno surgery results, noting nearly invisible scarring and normal appearance. Staff accommodate scheduling quickly despite busy schedule; Dr. Tutino stays available to patients throughout care.

Dr Rand ElBadri earns strong praise for clinical skill, attentive patient care, and clear guidance on treatment options in Waterdown.

La Fontaine draws strong loyalty from satisfied patients, who praise the clinic's professionalism, clean environment, and staff warmth. However, a subset of long-term clients report persistent complications across multiple procedures, requiring costly revisions without resolution, raising questions about consistency and follow-up care.

Strong majority of patients report excellent results and comfort under Dr. Gallant's care, with particular praise for body contouring and breast surgery outcomes. However, several reviewers describe insensitive consultations and unaddressed post-operative complications, suggesting inconsistency in patient care and communication.

Most long-term patients praise the expertise of Drs. Edstrom and Lemckert, along with attentive staff follow-up. However, recent reviews flag inconsistent reception service, unresponsive staff to voicemails, and complaints about treatment failures and confusing appointment policies. Evidence is limited to 27 Google reviews, with a stark divide between five-star loyalty and one/two-star frustration over operational friction.

Strong surgeons, inconsistent patient experience. Dr. Weinberg earns consistent praise for reconstructive work, breast surgery, and noticeable results; multiple patients report traveling from across the GTA and calling him an artist. However, a meaningful minority experienced dismissive, rushed, or outright rude encounters during consultations and follow-ups, with some complaints going unresolved for months. Aftercare stands out when it happens: detailed post-op instructions, email access to the doctor, monthly check-ins. Yet a few reviews note the doctor rushed through post-op appointments or refused to address specific concerns. The team includes a responsive coordinator called Sandy, though front-desk communication can falter.

All eight reviews are five-star. Patients report natural results across surgical and injectable treatments, with praise for Dr. Basil's attention to what they wanted and his team's comfort-focused approach. Work includes facial surgery, rhinoplasty, injectables, and brow/eyelid procedures.

Only two reviews available, both five-star. Patients praise Dr. Snell as talented and gifted, with one detailing relief from heavy breast pain after breast reduction and lift. Limited evidence for broader patterns.

Strong track record across multiple procedures: breast surgery, hand reconstruction, and body contouring earn consistent five-star praise for technical skill and staff warmth. Office is clean and attentive during consultations, though some patients report minimal post-op guidance after hand work and past friction over deposit policies.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Chuback's empathy and surgical skill; one older patient reported she was dismissive and impatient with a hearing-impaired elderly family member. Limited evidence on core cosmetic services.

Staff earn consistent praise for warmth and attentiveness across consultations, recovery, and follow-up. However, two older reviews flag communication breakdowns and lost records; one patient waited two years without response on a revision after a surgeon left.

One long-term patient reports years of positive experiences with facials and subtle injectables, praising staff attention to detail and natural results. Limited review evidence, but the single detailed account highlights personalized service and a collaborative approach to aging.

Dr. Zorn draws strong praise for her surgical skill, especially in breast reduction and reconstructive work spanning decades; patients report transformative results and appreciate her direct, no-nonsense approach. However, chronic wait times (hours beyond appointment), communication gaps when cancelling, and a blunt manner that alienates those seeking warmth create significant friction for a substantial minority of patients.

Dr. Kouchakan, Dr. Shafiee, and their team earn consistent praise for listening carefully and explaining procedures in clear language. Staff members like Bahareh, Jessica, Nazani, and Sahar are repeatedly noted for warmth and gentleness during treatments. The main friction point is appointment scheduling, which reviewers found cumbersome and insensitive to patients coming in with medical concerns. Iron infusion services feature prominently in recent feedback, alongside endoscopy and consultation visits. The clinic maintains a clean, welcoming space. Some patients reported lost referral documents and frustration with the booking process, though medical care itself received high marks across all named providers.

Dr. Jordan's technical skill in eye surgery and reconstructive procedures draws strong praise, particularly from patients with complex conditions like Graves disease or cancer-related removal. Yet a sharp split emerges: satisfied patients highlight minimal pain, skilled nursing, and thorough aftercare; dissatisfied ones report he becomes defensive when questioned, refuses second procedures patients request, and has terminated relationships with patients seeking clarification on treatment. Office staff inconsistency and cancellation policies add friction.

Dr. Hong's surgical skills and staff care earn consistent five-star praise, especially for reconstructive and cosmetic work; patients report feeling heard and supported through complex procedures. However, waits of one to two and a half hours are routine, and reception staff frequently fail to follow through on promises, leaving patients frustrated and distrustful of scheduling accuracy. \n\nReviewers single out the nursing team (especially Lin and Stella) for attentiveness and skill. Dr. Hong himself is described as efficient, observant, and able to explain procedures clearly. Patients note natural results across body contouring, facial work, and gender-affirming procedures. The clinic is located at 302 Sheppard Ave West and operates seven days; staff speak English and Cantonese. Cost is mentioned as reasonable relative to outcomes, but no specific prices appear in reviews.

Five-star reviews praise Dr. Brownrigg's rhinoplasties and non-surgical work (Botox noted as consistently excellent), plus scar-prevention expertise. One-star reviews center on rhinoplasties that looked unchanged from pre-surgery, despite 3D imaging promises and thousands spent. Patients reported steroid injections offered but ineffective, and say concerns were dismissed rather than addressed constructively. Evidence is thin overall: detail limited to recent rhinoplasty failures, Botox praise, facelift satisfaction, and reconstructive breathing improvements.

A split record: older five-star reviews praise the surgical team's skill and bedside manner, especially for post-weight-loss reconstruction. Recent one-star reviews report significant scar and body contouring regrets years later, with patients turned away to other surgeons for revision work.

Strong results on body and facial procedures from certain surgeons offset by mixed experiences with wait times, pricing clarity, and some surgical complications. Injections and chemical peels consistently praised; administrative friction and old satellite locations mentioned by reviewers.

Strong track record on minor procedures like cysts and moles, with patients praising clean technique and patient comfort. However, a significant subset report serious problems: one cyst regrew after incomplete removal, another keloid worsened, and an older review alleges major body contouring failures. Wait times and receptionist responsiveness vary widely.

Five-star reviews praise Dr. Haywood's surgical skill and warm approach, especially for breast reduction, with patients noting excellent scars and seamless experiences. One-star reviews flag delayed communication on post-op problems, rushed appointments, and inconsistent follow-up support when complications arose.

All five reviews praise Dr. Gantous for rhinoplasty work, noting his technical precision and attentive approach. Patients highlight his use of 3D imaging, detailed preoperative counselling, responsive email communication, and willingness to combine procedures when beneficial to facial balance.

Half of reviews are glowing accounts of life-changing breathing improvements and warm surgical experiences, while the other half describe prolonged post-op complications, dismissive follow-up care, and a surgeon perceived as uncaring toward outcomes. Patients on OHIP coverage report especially poor treatment and difficulty accessing revision help; those paying privately appear more satisfied overall.

Outcomes divide sharply. Some patients report excellent long-term results from breast reduction, tummy tuck, and reconstruction. Others faced rude interactions, year-long silence between consultation and surgery date, botched procedures (inverted nipples, uneven abdomen, thick scars), and refusals to correct problems. The office mixes up appointments, keeps incorrect patient records, and runs severely behind schedule. Review evidence is limited: only 30 texts cover 31 total reviews, with older accounts potentially confusing Dr. Wong with Dr. Vanessa Wong. Recent 1-star reviews cite specific failures (weight-focused pressure, communication breakdown weeks before surgery, no follow-up for 11-year-old surgical errors), while 5-star reviews from 4-6 years ago express strong satisfaction with results. This suggests recent operational or interpersonal decline.

Reviewers consistently praise Dr. Roumeliotis and his team for managing complex facial reconstruction after trauma, with particular note of emotional support during recovery. Limited review detail prevents assessment of broader service quality, wait times, or cosmetic procedure outcomes.

Most patients praise Dr. Ejaz and Dr. Ammara Ghumman for calm, attentive care and smooth minor procedures with minimal pain and clear aftercare. The clinic feels clean, organized, and responsive to concerns. However, multiple reviewers report feeling pressured into unnecessary procedures with misleading claims about cost and OHIP eligibility. Quoted prices for lipoma and cyst removal were substantially higher than elsewhere. Trust issues arise when clinical judgment appears profit-driven rather than patient-first.

Experienced rhinoplasty surgeon with a devoted following who report natural, long-lasting results and high confidence in his work. Significant cluster of unhappy revision patients, however, describe feeling unheard during consultations, repeat visits without tangible improvement, and disorganization in post-op care and communication.

Dr. Bell and his team earn consistent praise for breast augmentation, facial surgery, and laser treatments, with patients particularly crediting Shelby for non-surgical work and the staff for making them feel at ease. However, hair transplant reviews reveal a severe divide: several patients report significant complications, pressure during consultation, technician-led procedures, and being charged full price for fewer grafts than promised, with lasting physical and financial consequences.

Most patients report strong results and warm staff interactions, particularly from named team members Liz, Diana, Shannon, and Jenn. However, a handful of older reviews flag inconsistent bedside manner during consultations and revision surgeries, especially with ear procedures.

All 15 reviews are five-star. Patients consistently report that Dr. Best listens carefully, explains procedures clearly, and delivers results that exceed expectations-from rhinoplasty breathing improvements to nearly invisible scar revision. Her team, including assistant Shanthi, creates a welcoming clinic atmosphere.

Most satisfied patients praise Dr. Hynes' skill, the staff's warmth (especially Karen at front desk), and smooth healing. Yet serious gaps emerge: one patient experienced asymmetry after abdominoplasty with zero follow-up from the clinic despite repeated contact; phone lines are consistently busy or divert to an unrelated device seller; and complications go unaddressed. Past reviews glow, but recent ones flag a stark decline in accountability and communication. Since review evidence is limited, note that detail provided here reflects only these 17 reviews.

Patients report stark contrasts: some experienced compassionate, meticulous care through major reconstructive surgery, while others faced uneven body-contouring results, delayed revisions, and communication breakdowns that required legal involvement. Evidence is limited to a handful of recent reviews.

Both reviewers praise Dr. Mark Baily and staff member Karyn for genuine care and detailed explanations before and after procedures. Long-term focus on patient comfort and pain relief, with responsive aftercare support.

Two patients reported strong satisfaction years after chin and eyelid surgery, citing Dr. Fialkov's technical skill, thoughtful approach, and supportive office environment. Limited review volume constrains broader assessment.

The clinic divides sharply. Patients treated by Dr. Rathee or in shorter-wait visits praise genuine listening and effective treatment; Dr. Mani Raman receives consistent complaints of rudeness, dismissiveness, and appointments that last 3-5 minutes despite 40-minute-plus waits. The core frustration is the gap between long wait times and very brief time with the doctor. Staff and front-desk issues compound the problem. Booking calls go unanswered, appointment administration makes errors, and the clinic seems aware of wait times but takes no meaningful action. A few patients report pleasant, punctual experiences, but they are far outnumbered by those who feel unheard, rushed, and disrespected.

Reviewers split sharply on Dr. Overduin's practice. Five-star patients praise her carpal tunnel releases, mole removals, and minor skin surgery as quick and well-healed, with staff described as respectful and thorough. A significant minority report serious concerns: surgical scissors left unsealed on trays, discriminatory treatment based on race or religion, poor follow-up after complications, last-minute scheduling, and aggressive office conduct when questioned. The practice handles hand surgery and reconstructive cases competently according to satisfied patients, but operational issues and documented incidents of discrimination and sanitation lapses dominate negative accounts. One patient detailed ongoing complications from trigger finger surgery met with minimal support, and multiple reviewers noted the aging facility lacks privacy and professional polish.

Limited review evidence: two five-star ratings over 8 years praise Dr. Bailey's empathy and a staff member named Guri, but concrete details about services or results are sparse.

Most reviewers praise Dr. Chitte's surgical skill, especially for hand trauma and breast reconstruction, noting his patience and careful listening. However, a persistent thread of complaints spans years: delayed or missing referrals to physio and family doctors, unreturned voicemails, and long in-office waits. Administrative friction appears to have worsened after a clinic transition.

Dr. Charleton earns consistent praise for surgical skill and honest, empathetic communication, especially with breast cancer patients. Office administration is his weak point: reviewers report missed callbacks, delayed appointment bookings, and staff who don't follow up or apologize for errors.

Dr. Turley receives consistently strong praise for bedside manner and reconstructive hand surgery, with several patients reporting excellent healing from trauma and functional repairs. However, a vocal minority report poor cosmetic results, overly deep incisions for minor procedures, and significant office access issues. The clinic's automated phone system does not accept messages, and multiple patients describe arriving to find the office closed during posted hours or being turned away after surgeries were cancelled.